May 29, 2022·edited May 29, 2022Liked by Dustin Broadbery
As an educator and an astrologer, I often look to where the planet Jupiter is placed in a person's natal chart. Jupiter represents truth, organic, divine law, and the broad mind to travel the world to learn, grow, process and live according to a plan of wisdom, insight and intuition. It becomes a big responsibility for people to recognize this about him/herself, and once within the portal of the socially contrived education system, it is necessary to keep a keen focus on what is truth and what is well-designed propaganda. If this is carelessly overlooked, the other side of Jupiter can get extremely righteous and get very lost in expanding whatever prophesy perpetuates their views. Keeping a safe, lonely distance from becoming trapped and victimized by one's own righteous desires, is the challenging dynamic which beckons our constant attention as avatars.
Very interesting comment, thank you. My first house ruling planet is Jupiter, which is also my seventh house conjunct Mercury. My kid sister is an astrologer too!
Interesting hearing about the other side of Jupiter, particularly the righteousness and perpetuation of peoples personal views.
The elites view us as hackable animals. And in this age of mass-communication, following the degradation of our culture and value systems over the past few decades, the masses are ideologically bankrupt and therefore ready to onboard with whatever narrative is trending or feels safe.
The key to navigating these dangerous times is to remain heart centred and to know the difference between truth and consensus.
Most likely, you are a Sag with a Gemini Jupiter-Mercury. . No wonder, you are a writer of the spirit of truth! The line: ". . difference between truth and consensus" . . very good! And, may I add: truth and self-proclaimed, consensus.
Dustin, I just watched your interview with Luke Dodson https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJWaiwMPyEs. Very interesting and so depressing the view numbers are so low and that someone like you has a small readership compared to someone like Sage Hana who might say some good things but says a lot of complete tripe too - can't work out if she's paid controlled opposition.
When I saw the title of this article when it appeared in Off-Guardian I simply thought, "Well, about time," and I'm afraid I didn't even read it. I repeat "revelation of the method" ad nauseam because people simply don't seem to catch onto it ... even when they are familiar with the concept they just don't seem to see how prevalently it applies and how significant it is and it drives me mad. Catte actually wrote an article (https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/17/the-myth-of-the-infallible-elite/) in which she claimed that I think the power elite are infallible and any seeming mistake they make must be deliberate which I've never claimed, I just say that lots of things we see in psyops that might be misconstrued as slip ups are not slip ups but deliberate giveaways ... and this is abundantly clear because showing us images of people falling flat on their face and laid out on the ground and patients in ICUs who are obviously crisis actors, etc cannot possibly be mistakes they must be deliberate. The thing is if they ever do screw up what difference would it make? If all their intentional giveaways can pass so easily why wouldn't a genuine screwup?
"According to Michael Hoffman: first they suppress the counterargument, and when the most opportune time arrives, they reveal aspects of what's really happened, but in a limited hangout sort of way."
I don't quite agree with this definition of revelation of the method. I think with ROTM clear signs are given before, during and after, not just after (all about not doing anything without our consent) and limited hangout or controlled opposition is actually a different phenomenon whose purpose is to weaken the opposition. There's definitely a kind of overlap but I think they're still distinct phenomena.
With covid we got the signs with the exercises before - Event 201 and Crimson Contagion (among others) while the presaging at the London Olympics which can be seen as predictive programming can also be seen as ROTM. During the pandemic we got the images of people falling flat on their faces and being told species of snakes were reservoirs of the virus, crisis actors playing patients and so on. Now we're getting calls for amnesty, lockdowns were excessive, etc.
Predictive programming, revelation of the method and controlled opposition are distinct phenomena but items can be used multi-functionally, I guess it's interesting how they all work together somehow.
Thanks for this detailed reply and analysis Petra. Interesting to see that Cate quoted you on OG. I rather agree with everything you said. The ROTM article I wrote was a short expose of many themes, which had to be summarised into a series of short bullet points.
The psychological takeover runs deep, the fake reality is complex and convoluted. Revelation of the Method and Predictive Programming are just aspects of whats happening. I should imagine there are far more devils in the detail, concealed and known only to those orchestrating this coup d'état
I wanted to also thank you for your support and patronage - much appreciated!
" ... known only to those orchestrating this coup d'état."
Yes, it's scary to realise that even if you think you've got the fundamentals the majority have no clue about, you really have no idea how vast the extent of your ignorance ... I try not to think about it. What irritates me is that I recognise that I'm just a pretty simple prosaic logical thinker ... all I do is take golden nuggets from here and there (often a YouTube comment will contain a fabulous bit of information) and join the dots ... and after I've joined them I try to get out to others on the same side of the opposition fence that straightforward joining of dots ... but they won't have it.
The biggest problem I think with people's thinking is that they anchor into one belief or another (whichever side of the psyop fence) and they will not be coaxed out of it - but those in power understand exactly how we anchor into our beliefs - they understand us so very much better than we understand ourselves. Sure, I believed that the evil US government killed all those poor people in the towers for four pretty dedicated years of study but then I got the two-pronged propaganda strategy - one for the believers and one for the disbelievers that, of course, they couldn't fail to anticipate ... and as if they're going to let the disbelievers simply get the narrative correct. An absurdity! They'll let them get it correct for a baby psyop such as Sandy Hook but they go massively out of their way in the big psyops such as 9/11 and covid to have everyone get it wrong. It's not rocket science, they want to fool us all - why wouldn't they?
As an educator and an astrologer, I often look to where the planet Jupiter is placed in a person's natal chart. Jupiter represents truth, organic, divine law, and the broad mind to travel the world to learn, grow, process and live according to a plan of wisdom, insight and intuition. It becomes a big responsibility for people to recognize this about him/herself, and once within the portal of the socially contrived education system, it is necessary to keep a keen focus on what is truth and what is well-designed propaganda. If this is carelessly overlooked, the other side of Jupiter can get extremely righteous and get very lost in expanding whatever prophesy perpetuates their views. Keeping a safe, lonely distance from becoming trapped and victimized by one's own righteous desires, is the challenging dynamic which beckons our constant attention as avatars.
Very interesting comment, thank you. My first house ruling planet is Jupiter, which is also my seventh house conjunct Mercury. My kid sister is an astrologer too!
Interesting hearing about the other side of Jupiter, particularly the righteousness and perpetuation of peoples personal views.
The elites view us as hackable animals. And in this age of mass-communication, following the degradation of our culture and value systems over the past few decades, the masses are ideologically bankrupt and therefore ready to onboard with whatever narrative is trending or feels safe.
The key to navigating these dangerous times is to remain heart centred and to know the difference between truth and consensus.
Most likely, you are a Sag with a Gemini Jupiter-Mercury. . No wonder, you are a writer of the spirit of truth! The line: ". . difference between truth and consensus" . . very good! And, may I add: truth and self-proclaimed, consensus.
Nice piece. Welcome to Substack!
Thank you! Ive been meaning to join Substack
Dustin, I just watched your interview with Luke Dodson https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJWaiwMPyEs. Very interesting and so depressing the view numbers are so low and that someone like you has a small readership compared to someone like Sage Hana who might say some good things but says a lot of complete tripe too - can't work out if she's paid controlled opposition.
When I saw the title of this article when it appeared in Off-Guardian I simply thought, "Well, about time," and I'm afraid I didn't even read it. I repeat "revelation of the method" ad nauseam because people simply don't seem to catch onto it ... even when they are familiar with the concept they just don't seem to see how prevalently it applies and how significant it is and it drives me mad. Catte actually wrote an article (https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/17/the-myth-of-the-infallible-elite/) in which she claimed that I think the power elite are infallible and any seeming mistake they make must be deliberate which I've never claimed, I just say that lots of things we see in psyops that might be misconstrued as slip ups are not slip ups but deliberate giveaways ... and this is abundantly clear because showing us images of people falling flat on their face and laid out on the ground and patients in ICUs who are obviously crisis actors, etc cannot possibly be mistakes they must be deliberate. The thing is if they ever do screw up what difference would it make? If all their intentional giveaways can pass so easily why wouldn't a genuine screwup?
"According to Michael Hoffman: first they suppress the counterargument, and when the most opportune time arrives, they reveal aspects of what's really happened, but in a limited hangout sort of way."
I don't quite agree with this definition of revelation of the method. I think with ROTM clear signs are given before, during and after, not just after (all about not doing anything without our consent) and limited hangout or controlled opposition is actually a different phenomenon whose purpose is to weaken the opposition. There's definitely a kind of overlap but I think they're still distinct phenomena.
With covid we got the signs with the exercises before - Event 201 and Crimson Contagion (among others) while the presaging at the London Olympics which can be seen as predictive programming can also be seen as ROTM. During the pandemic we got the images of people falling flat on their faces and being told species of snakes were reservoirs of the virus, crisis actors playing patients and so on. Now we're getting calls for amnesty, lockdowns were excessive, etc.
Predictive programming, revelation of the method and controlled opposition are distinct phenomena but items can be used multi-functionally, I guess it's interesting how they all work together somehow.
Thanks for this detailed reply and analysis Petra. Interesting to see that Cate quoted you on OG. I rather agree with everything you said. The ROTM article I wrote was a short expose of many themes, which had to be summarised into a series of short bullet points.
The psychological takeover runs deep, the fake reality is complex and convoluted. Revelation of the Method and Predictive Programming are just aspects of whats happening. I should imagine there are far more devils in the detail, concealed and known only to those orchestrating this coup d'état
I wanted to also thank you for your support and patronage - much appreciated!
" ... known only to those orchestrating this coup d'état."
Yes, it's scary to realise that even if you think you've got the fundamentals the majority have no clue about, you really have no idea how vast the extent of your ignorance ... I try not to think about it. What irritates me is that I recognise that I'm just a pretty simple prosaic logical thinker ... all I do is take golden nuggets from here and there (often a YouTube comment will contain a fabulous bit of information) and join the dots ... and after I've joined them I try to get out to others on the same side of the opposition fence that straightforward joining of dots ... but they won't have it.
The biggest problem I think with people's thinking is that they anchor into one belief or another (whichever side of the psyop fence) and they will not be coaxed out of it - but those in power understand exactly how we anchor into our beliefs - they understand us so very much better than we understand ourselves. Sure, I believed that the evil US government killed all those poor people in the towers for four pretty dedicated years of study but then I got the two-pronged propaganda strategy - one for the believers and one for the disbelievers that, of course, they couldn't fail to anticipate ... and as if they're going to let the disbelievers simply get the narrative correct. An absurdity! They'll let them get it correct for a baby psyop such as Sandy Hook but they go massively out of their way in the big psyops such as 9/11 and covid to have everyone get it wrong. It's not rocket science, they want to fool us all - why wouldn't they?